LCM Alert Validation

Phase 2 Pilot
No Defect Detected
55%
Confidence
Failure Category
No Fault Found
Subcategory
No Fault Found
Approved by Kevin Eisentrout

Work Order Details

Asset ID
V504385
Site
DCA6
Vendor
TA
Circuit
RED (Brake)
Date Actioned
2026-05-07T18:59:23.838000+00:00
Week
19
amz-id
0409064025
Relay Garage

AI Deep Dive Analysis

Sensor Verdict: The LCM system generated a 'Defect Detected' alert on the RED (Brake) circuit for trailer V504385 at site DCA6. Confidence in the sensor alert is moderate (55%) — the sensor did flag a real-time anomaly on a specific circuit, which is consistent with typical LCM behavior for transient or intermittent brake light faults. However, the vendor's claim of 'no defects found' cannot be ruled out, as intermittent faults (e.g., loose connectors, marginal wiring) can sometimes self-resolve before inspection. The absence of any confirming documentation from the technician makes it impossible to validate either the alert or the clearance with confidence.
Photo Evidence: No photos were attached or referenced in this work order. The LCM troubleshooting procedure explicitly required photographs of each illuminated light in the circuit, a clear image of the nosebox wiring, and a TechAssist app completion screenshot showing a green 'Verified' status beside each of the five circuits. None of these deliverables were provided. This is a significant documentation failure and means the 'no defect found' determination is entirely unverifiable from a review standpoint.
Vendor Compliance: The vendor (TA) did not follow the LCM troubleshooting procedure as instructed. There is no evidence that the Phillips Connect TechAssist app was used — no screenshots, no reference numbers, and no structured feedback from the required category list were provided. The technician notes are brief, informal, and lack any technical specificity (e.g., 'TECH TN PEFORM LCM NO DEFECTS FOUND ALL PASSED'). The procedure required confirmation via PCT app with a verified green status on all five circuits; this standard was not met. This work order should be categorized as 'no defect found (not confirmed with PCT).'
Repair Summary: No repairs were made to the RED (Brake) circuit or any lighting component. The line items billed are entirely unrelated to the alerting circuit: a speed sensor activation (PCT sensor), standard service labor, shop supply/environmental fee, and lot service hourly labor billed under a 'Warranty' failure code. None of these charges reflect brake light diagnosis, lighting parts replacement, or nosebox work. The billing pattern is inconsistent with the scope of a legitimate LCM lighting inspection and raises concerns about whether any meaningful lighting work was performed.
Key Concerns: Several red flags are present in this work order. First, the billed parts and labor have no apparent connection to the RED brake circuit alert — a speed sensor activation and warranty lot labor are not standard outputs of an LCM lighting inspection. Second, there are zero photos and no TechAssist app evidence, which are non-negotiable requirements of the LCM troubleshooting protocol. Third, the technician notes are poorly written and lack the technical detail expected from a certified LCM inspection. Fourth, the 'no defect found' outcome combined with non-compliant documentation and unrelated billing creates a pattern that warrants escalation for vendor accountability review. This work order should be flagged for follow-up to confirm the trailer's RED circuit status and potentially re-inspect at the next available opportunity.

LCM Current Readings — All Circuits

RED (Brake) ALERTING
GREEN (Right Turn)
YELLOW (Left Turn)
BROWN (Marker)
BLACK (Clearance / License Plate)

Vendor WO Notes

Yard Location Update: ParkingSlip - WS321 --- SUBMIT EST THANKS TN TA COMPLAINT CUSTOMER STATES RED CIRICUIT ALERT DETE CTED CAUSE TBD CORRECTION TECH TN PEFORM LCM NO DEFECTS FOUND A LL PASSED ALL WORK REQUESTED COMPLETED THANKS TN --- TY TA --- pv

Defect Photos

TC_04184.jpeg TC_04175.jpeg TC_04192.jpeg TC_04163.jpeg TC_04165.jpeg TC_04181.jpeg TC_04168.jpeg TC_04196.jpeg TC_04190.jpeg TC_04198.jpeg TC_04183.jpeg TC_04191.jpeg TC_04161.jpeg TC_04180.jpeg TC_04162.jpeg TC_04197.jpeg TC_04174.jpeg TC_04171.jpeg TC_04188.jpeg TC_04194.jpeg TC_04189.jpeg TC_04182.jpeg TC_04164.jpeg TC_04195.jpeg TC_04187.jpeg TC_04167.jpeg TC_04199.jpeg TC_04170.jpeg TC_04176.jpeg TC_04186.jpeg TC_04172.jpeg TC_04179.jpeg TC_04173.jpeg TC_04166.jpeg TC_04177.jpeg TC_04193.jpeg IMG_4341.png TC_04185.jpeg TC_04169.jpeg TC_04178.jpeg

LLM Classification (Editable)

Reviewer Input

Approved by Kevin Eisentrout on 2026-05-16T11:22:58.769854

← Back to Deep Dive