LCM Record — HV2602497

Defect Detected

88%

Confidence

Failure Category

Lighting

Subcategory

Lighting - Missing Light

Approved by Kevin Eisentrout

Work Order Details

Asset ID

HV2602497

Site

PDX9

Vendor

COX

Circuit

RED (Brake)

Date Actioned

2026-05-12T21:31:05+00:00

Week

amz-id

03001262

Relay Garage

Open in RG →

AI Deep Dive Analysis

Sensor Verdict: The LCM sensor issued a 'Defect Detected' result on the RED (Brake) circuit with a confidence of 88. This determination is strongly supported by the technician's findings: upon activating the RED circuit through the Phillips Connect TechAssist app, all brake lights illuminated properly except for one strobe light that was confirmed missing. The sensor alert aligns directly with the physical defect found, indicating the LCM system performed correctly in identifying an anomaly on the brake lighting circuit. The slight reduction from 100% confidence reflects minor documentation gaps that prevent absolute certainty regarding the full scope of the defect and repair.

Photo Evidence: No usable photos were provided or referenced in this work order. The LCM troubleshooting procedure explicitly requires photographs of each illuminated light in the circuit, a clear image of the nosebox wiring, and a TechAssist app completion screenshot showing a green 'Verified' status beside each of the five circuits. None of these were submitted. The absence of photo documentation is a significant compliance gap and makes it impossible to independently verify the condition of the trailer, the nature of the defect, the quality of the repair, or the final state of the nosebox and wiring harness.

Vendor Compliance: The vendor (COX) partially followed the LCM troubleshooting procedure. Positively, the technician did use the Phillips Connect TechAssist app and activated each of the five circuits (RED, GREEN, YELLOW, BROWN, BLACK), reporting findings for each — which is in alignment with the procedural intent. However, compliance falls short in several critical areas: no photos were submitted, no TechAssist completion screenshot showing 'Verified' status was provided, and the feedback provided does not precisely map to the required category language (e.g., 'light missing' is a defined category but was not explicitly stated as such in the notes). The line items also rely on a placeholder entry ('Placeholder - Details to Follow'), which means part-level documentation is entirely absent at the time of review.

Repair Summary: The repair performed addressed the correct faulted circuit — RED (Brake). The technician identified a missing brake strobe light, removed and replaced it, and confirmed it was working properly upon re-test. All other circuits (GREEN, YELLOW, BROWN, BLACK) were tested and reported as functioning correctly. However, the line item for the replacement part is listed only as a placeholder with no part number, brand, quantity detail beyond '1.0', or price — making it impossible to confirm whether a compliant or approved lamp was used, or to validate the repair cost.

Key Concerns: Several concerns warrant attention from a fleet maintenance review standpoint. First, the complete absence of photo documentation is a major deficiency — this is a core requirement of the LCM troubleshooting procedure and its omission undermines the ability to audit or validate the repair. Second, the use of a placeholder line item with no part details is problematic; reviewers cannot confirm part compliance, brand, or cost accuracy. Third, while the technician reported all other circuits as operational, this was done without photographic evidence, so those findings cannot be independently verified. Finally, the cause listed as 'UNKNOWN' for the strobe light being missing is worth noting — it is unclear whether the light was physically absent (stolen, fell off, was never installed) or had failed in place; this distinction matters for root cause tracking and warranty/repeat repair analysis. Overall, the vendor identified and resolved the correct defect, but documentation quality is well below standard.

LCM Current Readings — All Circuits

RED (Brake) ALERTING

GREEN (Right Turn)

YELLOW (Left Turn)

BROWN (Marker)

BLACK (Clearance / License Plate)

Vendor WO Notes

Yard Location Update: ParkingSlip - PS512 --- Yard Location Update: ParkingSlip - PS512 Created by : RelayGarage Created at: 2026-05-12T14:53:24.000Z --- RO#301912303 Labor Line 1: COMPLAINT - SMART BOX DETECTED SHORT IN LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSE- UNKNOWN CORRECTION- FIRST I ACTIVATED THE APP AND CONNECTED TO THE TRAILER, NEXT I FOLLOWED THE PROCEDURE AND STARTED WITH THE RED CIRCUIT ONCE ACTIVATED BRAKES LIGHTS ALL WORKED EXCEPT THE STROBE LIGHT, BEFORE PROCEEDING THIS NEEDS TO BE REPLACED AND RE TESTED Labor Line 2: COMPLAINT - SMART BOX DETECTED SHORT IN LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSE- BRAKE STROBE LIGHT MISSING CORRECTION- REMOVED AND REPLACED LIGHT AND TESTED AND NOW THE LIGHT IS WORKING PROPERLY Labor Line 3: COMPLAINT - SMART BOX DETECTED SHORT IN LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSE- UNKNOWN CORRECTION- NEXT TESTED GREEN CIRCUIT AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING PROPERLY , TESTED THE YELLOW CIRCUIT NEXT AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING PROPERLY, NEXT TESTED THE BROWN CIRCUIT AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING PROPERLY AND LASTLY TESTED THE BALCK CIRCUIT SND EVERYTHING IS WOROKG PROPERLY UNIT COMPLETED --- PV --- V A/H